Distinct realities, heterogeneous mechanisms, these two specific types of being able if articulate and obey a subordination system that cannot be traced without light in consideration the concrete situation and the singular type of intervention. The important one is that the analyses had indicated clearly to be able that them molecular peripherals and had not been confiscated and absorbed for the State. Necessarily they are not created by the State, nor, if they had been born outside of it, inevitably had been reduced to a form or manifestation of the central device. To be able them if they exert in varied levels and in different points of the social net and in to this micron-powers exist them complex integrated or not to the State, distinction that does not seem, until then, to have been excellent or decisive for its analysis. (FOUCAULT, 1979, P.
XI). One perceives above for this reading, that Michel Foucault does not exclude the power of the State of the relations of being able coexistente in the social environment, but, it contests the hypothesis of that the State would be the central and only agency of being able, and despite the net of being able existing in the modern society would be linked or correspond the results of extension of the state. Contrarily, Foucault believes that the power cannot be located in an institution or the State (central and exclusive device of being able). Taking as example the marxist conception to the power as Foucault if it deals with economic functionality of the power, having the paper to keep and to reproduce the classroom domination, as well as the basic conditions of the production. The critical foucautiana exactly consists of this marxiana and marxist methodology the conception economist, to the measure that to approach the power as a superstructure of the economy, treating, thus, the power as ownership and not as an exercise.